­
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to be given this stately home by Queen as a wedding

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to be given this stately home by Queen as a wedding 23 May 2018 06:15 #7829

  • Paul-UB40
  • Paul-UB40's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 1833
  • Thank you received: 1122
By EMILY HODGKIN
, Wed, May 2, 2018 | UPDATED: 09:48, Sun, May 20, 2018

Queen Elizabeth II looks likely to give Prince Harry, 33, and Meghan Markle, 36, a stately home as a gift.

She has previously bequeathed Anmer Hall in the Sandringham estate to Prince William, 35, and Kate Middleton, 36.

Now it appears she may well give Harry and Meghan a country house on the royal estate too.

Royal finance expert David McClure told Cosmopolitan: "William got a place on the Sandringham estate at Anmer and my hunch is that if he (Harry) gets a place in the country, he and Meghan might want to be nearer London and as such somewhere in the Home Counties might be preferable.

"The Queen has a habit of giving property.”

More Here;
www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/954068/meghan-markle-prince-harry-royal-wedding-queen-present-gift-news-latest?utm_source=externaloutbrain&utm_medium=recommendations&utm_term=paid&utm_content=lifeandstyle&utm_campaign=2016&utm_term=001080aa6ee0a7d5be5345b87faefaf6c9

Bloody Nice for the Few, While the rest of us struggle to keep any kind of Roof over our head. :angry:
YNWA: You'll Never Walk Alone
The following user(s) said Thank You: comply or die, Warrior

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to be given this stately home by Queen as a wedding 23 May 2018 13:03 #7849

  • Warrior
  • Warrior's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • New Member
  • Posts: 16
  • Thank you received: 42
At the risk of coming over all “enemy of the people”, it seems that the more I think about it, the worse it gets. Four days removed from the event, the reality of it has sunk in.

The generally agreed cost of Hazza and Sparkle's wedding is about £32m, for an advert for the royal family that lasted just over one hour.

That seems quite a lot for what is actually a personal event dressed up as a national occasion

In fact is seems like a dizzyingly large amount of money to splurge on anything that doesn't float or have walls.

The detail of the spending is frankly astonishing.

The cost of the silver plated trumpets, bought specially for the occasion was £90,000. I don't know what the personally engraved harp cost but I am sure they don't come cheap either.

A wedding planning company estimated the cost of the little things that made the day special.

The cake cost £50,000. That is, a sponge and cream creation with frosting on the top that would be gone that night was the same price as a new BMW with all the options ticked on the order form.

Those lovely flowers that adorned the doorway to the chapel would have been about £110,000. You can buy a house in some areas of Her Majesty's realm for less than that.

A glass marquee for the evening reception for the extra special guests with the right invite would have come in at £300,000.

Outside the world's largest occupied castle that has around a thousand rooms, the largest of which is 55m long, they felt the need to add an extra room, for one night only, at the cost of a year's salary for fifteen nurses.

The dress for the glowing bride would have been about £400,000, apparently.

How you can spend even half that much on a white dress that will only ever be worn once for a period of a few hours is unfathomable.

The sausage roll and a cup of tea that were provided for those 2,640 people specially selected to be near the ceremony, but not actually a part of it, were £10 each.

Twenty-six grand on snacks.

The big expense was the security.

We are told the bill for that, which was presented in its entirety to the taxpayer, was over £30m.

Police officers had their leave cancelled and were bussed in from neighbouring forces to supplement those stationed nearby.

There were uniformed police and plain clothed ones and armed response specialists and snipers and all the rest of it. No measure was left untaken to protect the happy couple.

Think of that when you have your home burgled, or your car stolen, or you are mugged or assaulted and the police are reluctant to attend because they don't have the staff due to the massive cuts in their budgets since the policy of austerity began.

Cressida Dick, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner says she needs an extra 600 officers urgently. The Met has lost £600m of funding since 2011 but there was no such worries about a lack of funds for the grand event.

If you are a criminal, and you could bear to miss the show, it would have been a fantastic time to do a bit of robbing in the south east of England.

Thirty million pounds for security seems a bit steep, but that's not the half of it.

That doesn't include the ceremonial security - the ones on horseback with the gleaming chest plates and bouncy hair helmets.

I do not know how much it costs to run a horse, but I am sure they don't come cheap and neither do the stables they keep them in.

Add to that the non-combatant uniforms and shiny accessories that only ever come out for the royals and the bill must be in the hundreds of millions.

Some of the money was apparently paid from the royals' own pockets.

Let's leave aside that they only have that money because their ancestors took land from the people and gave it to themselves, let's forget that on top of that there is the vast yearly income that we gift them - £82m to the Queen last year alone.

It is not really relevant that the Queen paid for the flowers or that Meghan might have paid for the dress, or that the royals laid on the champagne and the langoustines wrapped in smoked salmon and the grilled asparagus and the quails' eggs for themselves and their friends and celebs.

What is relevant is that while Her Majesty's subjects sleep in doorways, while the NHS is so underfunded that even cancer patients have to wait a year for treatment, while the use of food banks is at an all-time high, while even the middle class find they are only just getting by and after years of lower government spending on essentials like care for people suffering, the family of our head of state is behaving like Marie Antoinette.

Except it is worse than that.

We are not invited to eat cake, we are invited watch THEM eat cake.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Spanner, Paul-UB40, comply or die, Dizzy, Verc

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to be given this stately home by Queen as a wedding 23 May 2018 13:32 #7851

  • Benefit Bolshie
  • Benefit Bolshie's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 362
  • Thank you received: 614
A brilliantly crafted post Warrior. Thank you for it. I’m going to copy it and shove it in the face of the next work coach who gets stroppy with me.

For the sake of balance it has to be said that in some UK cities and towns homeless and poor people are also provided with accommodation at the Queen’s pleasure.

It’s called prison.

Sick-making when you think, in 2018.

There’s a lady, of nodding acquaintance and dubious virtue, there’s been gossip, living on our street, who wore down everyone she spoke to several weeks ago going on about how she couldn’t afford to pay her Council Tax.

Bumped into her on Monday morning as I was going to sign-on, a thankless duty I perform every other week to help prevent another body from blocking up the town’s gutters, never let it be said that I don’t do my bit for the community. Anyway, she told that she’d just got back from London; she’d been down there all weekend to see the wedding.

Unusually for me I made some sarcastic remark that didn’t go down very well. Suffice to say, I think I’m scratched from her Christmas list, if I was ever on it.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Verc

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to be given this stately home by Queen as a wedding 24 May 2018 07:43 #7876

  • Paul-UB40
  • Paul-UB40's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 1833
  • Thank you received: 1122
Benefit Bolshie wrote:
A brilliantly crafted post Warrior. Thank you for it. I’m going to copy it and shove it in the face of the next work coach who gets stroppy with me.

For the sake of balance it has to be said that in some UK cities and towns homeless and poor people are also provided with accommodation at the Queen’s pleasure.

It’s called prison.

Well I think it was nice of her when my whole life had gone to shit, to get a room, 2 meals a day, a Shower every day & Education and all for Free.
But that has been the only "help" I have ever had. :angry: :whistle:
YNWA: You'll Never Walk Alone

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to be given this stately home by Queen as a wedding 24 May 2018 14:36 #7898

  • Benefit Bolshie
  • Benefit Bolshie's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 362
  • Thank you received: 614
You wouldn't recommend it then, eh?

I stayed at worse places than that, in Blackpool, I think it was.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to be given this stately home by Queen as a wedding 24 May 2018 15:45 #7907

  • Paul-UB40
  • Paul-UB40's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 1833
  • Thank you received: 1122
Benefit Bolshie wrote:
You wouldn't recommend it then, eh?

I stayed at worse places than that, in Blackpool, I think it was.

Well Im rather proud to admit during a rather "Interesting Life" I have sampled the delights of 6 Jails across England and Wales.
Quality and Facilities varied, But I can Recommend HMP-Walton, Worst 2 were in London. :whistle: :pinch:
YNWA: You'll Never Walk Alone
­