­
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Welfare was meant to help the poor, not subsidise exploitative employers

Welfare was meant to help the poor, not subsidise exploitative employers 19 Sep 2018 17:58 #10231

  • TheFinnster
  • TheFinnster's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 218
  • Thank you received: 369
It will mean fewer jobs. That was the chorus from many on the right, from Tej Parikh of the Institute of Directors to the chancellor, Philip Hammond, in response to proposals from the shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, to improve conditions for gig economy workers. Such workers, he insisted, should be given similar rights to those in permanent work, including eligibility for sick pay, maternity pay and similar benefits. He promised to ban zero-hours contracts and introduce a “real living wage” of £10 an hour.

So what does it mean for Parikh and Hammond to insist that if gig workers are given decent benefits, jobs will be lost? Unpacked, what that suggests is that employers are willing, or able, to provide jobs only if workers accept low pay and poor conditions.

Put like that, few people would accept the moral logic of the argument. But it is rarely put like that. We take for granted that businesses create jobs and so have the right to dictate on what conditions jobs are created.

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/15/welfare-was-meant-to-help-the-poor-not-subsidise-exploitative-employers
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Paul-UB40
­